& Construction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15a6b/15a6b110afa57b4faa568a33b002660800904946" alt="architecture engineering and construction collection logo"
Integrated BIM tools, including Revit, AutoCAD, and Civil 3D
& Manufacturing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3189f/3189fb65d46647c29b1aa78ac452b0b379af6142" alt="product design manufacturing collection logo"
Professional CAD/CAM tools built on Inventor and AutoCAD
7 min read
In the world of stormwater management and drainage design, selecting the right software tool is crucial for effective planning, analysis, and implementation. Among the myriad of options available in the water industry, we often get asked how Autodesk InfoDrainage compares to tools like HydroCAD, TR-20, and TR-55. Each of these tools offers unique features and capabilities tailored to meet the diverse needs of engineers, designers, and urban planners. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, and each has a long history.
We’re providing a detailed comparison of these four tools to highlight the key differences and advantages of each. By reviewing a comprehensive feature-by-feature chart, you can gain a clearer understanding of how InfoDrainage, HydroCAD, TR-20, and TR-55 stack up against each other and make an informed decision for your next project.
As makers of InfoDrainage, we’re obviously biased towards our own software, but we wanted to approach this as fairly as possible, so we began this exercise with a chart of information published by HydroCAD on their website: HydroCAD, TR-20, TR-55 Comparison. We asked our technical solutions team to review the information and add a column for InfoDrainage to help us detail the similarities and differences between all four applications.
(Did we get any details wrong? Let us know.)
Criteria | HydroCAD | TR-20 | TR-55 | InfoDrainage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Runoff methodology | • Unit hydrograph procedure (unlimited points) • Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph • Rational Method | Unit hydrograph procedure (301 points) | Tabular method derived from TR-20 | • SWMM method • Rational method • Modified Rational method • SCS method • Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph • FEH Method • FSR Method • Time of Concentration Method • A long list of others |
Rainfall types | Extensive rainfall library, user-defined storms, and synthetic rainfall distributions generated from local precipitation frequency data | SCS type I, IA, II & III | SCS type I, IA, II & III | Extensive rainfall library, user-defined storms, and synthetic rainfall distributions generated from local precipitation frequency data |
Unit hydrograph | Extensive UH library including SCS, Delmarva, and others | SCS Unit Hydrograph or user-defined curve | SCS Unit Hydrograph only | Extensive UH library including ToC, SBUH, SCS, Laurenson, Modified Rational method, SWMM and others, plus user-defined |
Curve number entry | Automatic Curve Number look-up and weighting, with adjustment for unconnected impervious areas | Requires direct entry of composite curve number | Automatic Curve Number look-up and weighting, with adjustment for unconnected impervious areas | Automatic Curve Number calculations and adjustments based on imported land use and soil polygons |
Curve number weighting | Area-weighted, or separate runoff for each Curve Number with weighted flow | Requires direct entry of composite Curve Number | Area-weighted Curve Number | Automatic Curve Number calculations and adjustments based on imported land use and soil polygons |
Curve number limitations | No restrictions | No restrictions | Reduced accuracy as Curve Number differs from 75 | No restrictions |
Time of concentration calculations | All TR-55 methods plus common channel shapes, upland method, Curve Number method, and Kerby/Kirpich method | Contains no Tc calculations; requires direct Tc entry | Calculates Tc for sheet, shallow concentrated, and channel flow | Embedded calculators for Kirby/Kirpich, TR-55, Kinematic Wave and others |
Tc limitations | No restrictions | Must be greater than zero | Limited to 0.1–2 hours | No restrictions |
Tc precision | 1/10 minute or 1/600 hour | 1/100 hour | Rounded to nearest step | 1/100 of a minute |
Subarea limitations | None | None | Must not differ by more than factor of 5 | None |
Runoff accuracy | Within 1% of 1982 TR-20 release | “The standard” | Within +25% of TR-20 release | Within 1% of 1982 TR-20 release |
Reach routing | Muskingum-Cunge or Storage-indication method with optional routing delay (translation) | Modified Att-Kin procedure | No routing, separate tables for travel times of 0–3 hours | Dynamic wave equations |
Reach hydraulics | Automatic calculation for common shapes or custom cross-sections | None; requires entry of routing coefficients | N/A; no reach routing | Based on open channel and closed system geometry |
Pond routing | Storage-indication method, dynamic Storage-indication method, or simultaneous routing | Storage-indication method | None; only estimates ponding effects | Routing determined by the size, dimensions, and attributes of the pond, subject to the dynamic wave equations |
Pond hydraulics | Automatic calculations for orifice, weir, culvert, etc; used alone or combined for outlet structures | Must be entered directly; no calculations provided | N/A; no pond routing | Embedded calculators for common outlet structures and configurations including multi-stage risers, orifices, weirs, gates, etc |
Tailwater | Dynamic tailwater handling with all standard outlet devices | None; uses static stage-discharge curves | None; uses static stage-discharge curves | Tailwater can be free discharge or based on a fixed or variable WSE |
Dam breach | Progressive dam breach triggered at specified time or WSE | None | None | None |
Pumps | Full pump simulations including pipe losses and tailwater effects | None | None | Full pump simulations as outlet from SCMs |
Pond sizing estimate | Using actual inflow hydrograph | None | Using assumed hydrograph shape | Embedded calculators for pond size estimate based on discharge and quantity requirements |
Detention time | By plug-flow and center-of-mass methods | Not calculated | Not calculated | By plug-flow and center-of-mass methods; not explicitly reported |
Pond storage calculations | Automatic calculation from pond dimensions or surface areas, plus direct entry | Direct entry only | N/A; no pond routing | Automatic calculation based on the pond dimensions, shape, and slope |
Underground storage | Automatic chamber layout and modeling, including embedded storage calculations | Requires external calculations | Requires external calculations | Various underground storage (box, arch chambers, etc) can be modeled along with estimation with embedded calculators |
Flow diversions (split flows) | Automatic diversion of outflow from specified pond outlet(s) | Separate “Divert” procedure based on user-defined curve | N/A | Split flows based on HGL in the system subject to the dynamic wave equations |
Pollutant loading | Automatic land-use reporting and pollutant loading calculations. | None | None | Offers automatic pollutant loading options and removal methods via percentage and first-order decay |
Routing diagram | Interactive, on-screen, with labels and background image | None | None | • All infrastructure is drawn ‘true to site’ • Interactive, on-screen layouts which can be directly published to Civil 3D to be used in site plans • Adjustable labels, background imagery, surfaces, and more |
Calculation procedure | Automatically calculated as required | “Batch mode” calculation of entire watershed | Manual initiation of each calculation | Standard 1D analysis or 1D-2D analysis with fully exposed SWMM5 engine |
Unit system | US English, metric, or custom, plus split input/output units | US English only | US English only | US English, metric, or custom, plus split input/output units |
Graphics capabilities | Full graphics to screen, printer, or file | None | None | Full graphics, tables, videos, or files |
Reports | Automatic reports with headings, graphics, etc | Manual | Manual | • Custom or automatic options • Includes flexible reporting tables and easy exports to Civil 3D, PDF, or Excel |
Data storage | Automatic by job name | Manual | Manual | • Manual based on project name • Includes phase/scenario management with templates (rainfall data, SCMs, pipes and structures, etc) • Supports file recovery if program closes unexpectedly |
HydroCAD, TR-20, and TR-55 are just some of the Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) modeling programs available to stormwater modelers and land developers. We think the features the set InfoDrainage apart, however, are the same regardless of the competition. These include:
Your H&H modeling shouldn’t be representing your network with nodes and lines any longer – visuals are more important than ever, particularly when collaborating with other contractors and consultants on a project site. Since InfoDrainage offers seamless Civil 3D integration for visualizing ponds, profiles, channels, grade lines, etc, your modeling work can be easily displayed in the final deliverable.
It can be frustrating for civil engineers to need to learn multiple (sometimes antiquated) H&H programs or spreadsheets to please different regulatory agencies. InfoDrainage eases this frustration by providing the most diverse and wide-ranging set of rainfall, runoff, hydrograph, and other H&H methods on the market. InfoDrainage also provides over 40 different design calculators to right-size stormwater infrastructure such as ponds, rain gardens, pipes, and even green roofs.
While technically this might be considered just another one of InfoDrainage’s 40+ calculators, the ability to add polygons which can help automatically generate SCS Curve Numbers, Percentage Impervious, Volumetric Runoff Coefficient, and more has proven invaluable to our customers. Hours, if not days, of rework can be spent in antiquated programs when projects change and Curve Numbers must be recalculated. InfoDrainage saves civil engineers all that time and energy.
We often design systems for the 10 or 25-year storms, but as climate change impacts our “normal” storms with more volume and intensity, regulatory agencies are increasingly asking, “What happens when we have one of these more extreme events?” InfoDrainage allows you to answer that question with its 1D-2D analysis. When the analysis is run, as water fills and begins to surcharge, you can see where water will go, based on realistic surfaces and understand at what point flooding will impact nearby structures.
Before you purchase any H&H software, you should try it out:
Sign up for the One Water Blog newsletter, and we'll keep you updated about our top stories, along with the best content we find online. We only send out a newsletter when we have something interesting to share.
May we collect and use your data?
Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?
Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.