• InfoDrainage

Analyzing the connections summary report

Analyze the calculated pipe network design criteria for the no-flood status.


00:03

once your drainage design has met the no surcharge criteria,

00:07

it must be tested against the no flood criteria.

00:11

In this example, the pipes have been sized adequately for no surcharge.

00:15

The no flood design criteria has been set for an 18 storm sample size

00:20

and the validation tool has been run to check for missing data errors.

00:24

At this point you should be able to run the analysis however,

00:28

you may need to reload the design rainfall 30 year

00:31

dot I D R X file via the rainfall manager

00:35

on the ribbon

00:36

analysis tab analysis panel,

00:39

click go

00:41

info drainage processes. The calculations as you have defined them for this model,

00:45

which displays in the progress dialog

00:48

in this case, the model is simple with only one line of pipes that runs downhill

00:53

so the calculation does not take long

00:57

When it finishes

00:58

the connection summary,

00:59

Dialogue appears reporting the results for each pipe for one of the 18 storms

01:06

notice the maximum flow column.

01:08

These values are within acceptable levels for this model

01:12

of more importance is the status column

01:14

which in this case

01:15

reports that the pipes are either okay or sir charged.

01:20

If they are showing as sir charged that

01:22

is acceptable for this higher return period storm

01:25

what you do not want to see is a pipe showing is flooded.

01:29

In this example, none of the pipes are flooded.

01:33

You can also see that some of these pipes are showing as red and in bold

01:37

this indicates that these pipes are under capacity.

01:41

The surcharge pipes that are showing as normal text

01:44

may only be sir charged as a result of backing up from slower drainage downstream

01:49

during this larger storm

01:51

below the plan view, right in the bottom of the screen,

01:54

in the select event. Drop down is the storm that has created these results.

01:60

This storm is a 30 year storm that lasted 15 minutes in the summer.

02:05

You can expand the drop down to select any

02:07

one storm to access the results it produces.

02:10

However, what we really want to know is whether any of the 18 storms caused flooding.

02:17

To find this out.

02:18

At the top of the connection summary dialog, click the critical storm button.

02:23

The results in the table changed to show the worst storm of the 18

02:27

that were in this study.

02:29

In this case

02:31

it is a 30-year 15 minute winter storm

02:34

as indicated in the storm event column.

02:37

Also in the status column,

02:39

you can see that more pipes are now reported as being sir charged.

02:43

This is typical of drainage systems such as the current model,

02:47

which is a short, simple system,

02:49

whereas more complicated systems that have catchments and water storage features

02:53

will show a variety of pipe statuses

02:55

from many different types of storms.

02:58

Click the critical storms button to deactivate it,

03:02

then expand the select event. Drop down

03:05

and select the 30 year

03:10

Drag the dialogue aside and you can see that the highlighted bold

03:14

sir charged pipes in the table are also highlighted in the model.

03:19

Close the connections summary dialog

03:22

at this point it is beneficial to look at

03:24

the graphical information for some of these individual pipes

03:29

on the ribbon, click the results tab in the item results panel,

03:33

expand the connections drop down and you can see all the pipes listed.

03:38

Select pipe four.

03:41

The results pipe for dialogue opens showing the flow graph for that pipe,

03:47

As you can see from the key.

03:48

The green line represents the rainfall and the

03:51

red line represents the flow within pipe four

03:55

The rainfall graph is representative of a typical

03:57

dynamic rainfall graph in that it is symmetrical,

04:01

it starts at zero, builds up to a maximum across the center line

04:05

and then dissipates back down to zero

04:08

and in this case it ends at the 15 minute mark.

04:12

The flow graph is very similar in shape.

04:14

You can see that it lags behind the rainfall in time

04:17

and that it builds much more gradually up to the apex,

04:21

has a nice arc at the top, then comes back down gradually.

04:26

This smooth increase in decrease in flow gives us confidence in the results.

04:30

However, if you see rapid oscillations in the flow,

04:34

it could be a genuine effect or it could be a sign of an instability

04:39

instabilities occur when the simulation calculations

04:42

falter and will invalidate the results.

04:45

So, if you see something that does not make sense, you know,

04:48

it may require further investigation and refinement of the model.

04:53

You could run the flow calculations again for a shorter time step,

04:56

which is defined in the analysis criteria to see if it happens again.

05:01

Ultimately,

05:02

you need to apply your best judgment

05:04

to determine whether the results are realistic.

05:08

If you are in any doubt,

05:09

contact the support team,

05:12

click the tables tab.

05:14

If you wanted to copy these results out to a spreadsheet format, you can do that here.

05:20

Close the results pipe for dialogue

05:23

Back in the results tab of the ribbon, expand the junctions,

05:27

drop down and select Manhole four.

05:30

The results manhole for dialogue opens showing the flow

05:34

volume and depth graphs for that manhole

05:39

click to expand the view of these graphs.

05:42

The flow graph includes the rainfall graph as well

05:45

as the inflows and outflows for that manhole.

05:49

The graphs have a nice gradual curve to them.

05:52

Close the results manhole for dialogue.

05:56

Another way to review the results is by opening the profile view for this flow

06:01

in the tree view,

06:03

right click flow one and select show profile to open the profile flow one. Dialogue,

06:09

expand this dialogue

06:12

at the bottom are controls for playing through the rainfall scenario.

06:16

There are play

06:18

pause,

06:19

stop

06:20

rewind

06:21

and fast forward buttons

06:24

play the simulation through and you can see the pipes fill up and then drain away,

06:29

rewind it to about halfway through and pause it

06:33

Zoom into the profile view and notice that the pipes

06:37

are full and manhole four is almost halfway full.

06:41

So even though the pipes are sir charged,

06:44

there is still a great deal of room in the manhole.

06:47

It is nowhere near flooding,

06:49

nor is it even within the 300 millim threshold that would constitute flood risk.

06:55

The pink line that is, even with the top water level,

06:58

indicates the maximum head of water for the manholes.

07:02

Close the profile view. Dialogue

07:05

At this point,

07:06

these pipes have passed the tests for both the no surcharge and no flood states.

Video transcript

00:03

once your drainage design has met the no surcharge criteria,

00:07

it must be tested against the no flood criteria.

00:11

In this example, the pipes have been sized adequately for no surcharge.

00:15

The no flood design criteria has been set for an 18 storm sample size

00:20

and the validation tool has been run to check for missing data errors.

00:24

At this point you should be able to run the analysis however,

00:28

you may need to reload the design rainfall 30 year

00:31

dot I D R X file via the rainfall manager

00:35

on the ribbon

00:36

analysis tab analysis panel,

00:39

click go

00:41

info drainage processes. The calculations as you have defined them for this model,

00:45

which displays in the progress dialog

00:48

in this case, the model is simple with only one line of pipes that runs downhill

00:53

so the calculation does not take long

00:57

When it finishes

00:58

the connection summary,

00:59

Dialogue appears reporting the results for each pipe for one of the 18 storms

01:06

notice the maximum flow column.

01:08

These values are within acceptable levels for this model

01:12

of more importance is the status column

01:14

which in this case

01:15

reports that the pipes are either okay or sir charged.

01:20

If they are showing as sir charged that

01:22

is acceptable for this higher return period storm

01:25

what you do not want to see is a pipe showing is flooded.

01:29

In this example, none of the pipes are flooded.

01:33

You can also see that some of these pipes are showing as red and in bold

01:37

this indicates that these pipes are under capacity.

01:41

The surcharge pipes that are showing as normal text

01:44

may only be sir charged as a result of backing up from slower drainage downstream

01:49

during this larger storm

01:51

below the plan view, right in the bottom of the screen,

01:54

in the select event. Drop down is the storm that has created these results.

01:60

This storm is a 30 year storm that lasted 15 minutes in the summer.

02:05

You can expand the drop down to select any

02:07

one storm to access the results it produces.

02:10

However, what we really want to know is whether any of the 18 storms caused flooding.

02:17

To find this out.

02:18

At the top of the connection summary dialog, click the critical storm button.

02:23

The results in the table changed to show the worst storm of the 18

02:27

that were in this study.

02:29

In this case

02:31

it is a 30-year 15 minute winter storm

02:34

as indicated in the storm event column.

02:37

Also in the status column,

02:39

you can see that more pipes are now reported as being sir charged.

02:43

This is typical of drainage systems such as the current model,

02:47

which is a short, simple system,

02:49

whereas more complicated systems that have catchments and water storage features

02:53

will show a variety of pipe statuses

02:55

from many different types of storms.

02:58

Click the critical storms button to deactivate it,

03:02

then expand the select event. Drop down

03:05

and select the 30 year

03:10

Drag the dialogue aside and you can see that the highlighted bold

03:14

sir charged pipes in the table are also highlighted in the model.

03:19

Close the connections summary dialog

03:22

at this point it is beneficial to look at

03:24

the graphical information for some of these individual pipes

03:29

on the ribbon, click the results tab in the item results panel,

03:33

expand the connections drop down and you can see all the pipes listed.

03:38

Select pipe four.

03:41

The results pipe for dialogue opens showing the flow graph for that pipe,

03:47

As you can see from the key.

03:48

The green line represents the rainfall and the

03:51

red line represents the flow within pipe four

03:55

The rainfall graph is representative of a typical

03:57

dynamic rainfall graph in that it is symmetrical,

04:01

it starts at zero, builds up to a maximum across the center line

04:05

and then dissipates back down to zero

04:08

and in this case it ends at the 15 minute mark.

04:12

The flow graph is very similar in shape.

04:14

You can see that it lags behind the rainfall in time

04:17

and that it builds much more gradually up to the apex,

04:21

has a nice arc at the top, then comes back down gradually.

04:26

This smooth increase in decrease in flow gives us confidence in the results.

04:30

However, if you see rapid oscillations in the flow,

04:34

it could be a genuine effect or it could be a sign of an instability

04:39

instabilities occur when the simulation calculations

04:42

falter and will invalidate the results.

04:45

So, if you see something that does not make sense, you know,

04:48

it may require further investigation and refinement of the model.

04:53

You could run the flow calculations again for a shorter time step,

04:56

which is defined in the analysis criteria to see if it happens again.

05:01

Ultimately,

05:02

you need to apply your best judgment

05:04

to determine whether the results are realistic.

05:08

If you are in any doubt,

05:09

contact the support team,

05:12

click the tables tab.

05:14

If you wanted to copy these results out to a spreadsheet format, you can do that here.

05:20

Close the results pipe for dialogue

05:23

Back in the results tab of the ribbon, expand the junctions,

05:27

drop down and select Manhole four.

05:30

The results manhole for dialogue opens showing the flow

05:34

volume and depth graphs for that manhole

05:39

click to expand the view of these graphs.

05:42

The flow graph includes the rainfall graph as well

05:45

as the inflows and outflows for that manhole.

05:49

The graphs have a nice gradual curve to them.

05:52

Close the results manhole for dialogue.

05:56

Another way to review the results is by opening the profile view for this flow

06:01

in the tree view,

06:03

right click flow one and select show profile to open the profile flow one. Dialogue,

06:09

expand this dialogue

06:12

at the bottom are controls for playing through the rainfall scenario.

06:16

There are play

06:18

pause,

06:19

stop

06:20

rewind

06:21

and fast forward buttons

06:24

play the simulation through and you can see the pipes fill up and then drain away,

06:29

rewind it to about halfway through and pause it

06:33

Zoom into the profile view and notice that the pipes

06:37

are full and manhole four is almost halfway full.

06:41

So even though the pipes are sir charged,

06:44

there is still a great deal of room in the manhole.

06:47

It is nowhere near flooding,

06:49

nor is it even within the 300 millim threshold that would constitute flood risk.

06:55

The pink line that is, even with the top water level,

06:58

indicates the maximum head of water for the manholes.

07:02

Close the profile view. Dialogue

07:05

At this point,

07:06

these pipes have passed the tests for both the no surcharge and no flood states.

Step-by-step:

Once your drainage design has met the no-surcharge criteria, it must be tested against the no-flood criteria. In this example, the pipes have been sized adequately for no-surcharge; the no-flood design criteria have been set for an 18-storm sample size; and the validation tool has been run to check for missing data errors. At this point, the analysis can be run.

  1. On the ribbon, Analysis tab, Analysis panel, click Go.
    The InfoDrainage interface, with the Analysis Go button called out in the ribbon to begin the calculations.

InfoDrainage quickly processes the calculations and displays in the Progress dialog box. In this case, the model has only one line of pipes that runs downhill. When it finishes, the Connections Summary dialog box appears, reporting the results for each pipe for one of the eighteen storms.

  1. Expand the Connections Summary dialog box to see the entire table better.
    The Connections Summary dialog box, showing the seven pipes in the system in table format. Three of the pipe rows are highlighted red, to alert the user that they are surcharged and under capacity.

Notice the Maximum Flow column. These values are within acceptable levels for this model. Of more importance is the Status column, which, in this case, reports that the pipes are either OK or Surcharged. If they are showing as surcharged, that is acceptable for this higher return period storm. What you do not want to see is a pipe showing as Flooded. In this example, none of the pipes are flooded.

You can also see that some of these pipes are showing as red and in bold. This indicates that these pipes are under capacity. The surcharged pipes that are showing as normal text may only be surcharged as a result of backing up from slower drainage downstream during this larger storm.

Below the Plan View right in the bottom of the screen, in the Select Event drop-down, is the storm that has created these results. This storm is a 30-year storm that lasted 15 minutes in the summer.

  • The Plan View in the background, with the Connections Summary report in the foreground. The Critical Storm button is highlighted. At the bottom, the Select Event drop-down has been expanded and the entire list of 18 storms is showing.
  1. Expand the Select Event drop-down to select any one storm to access the results it produces.
  2. To know whether any of the 18 storms caused flooding, at the top of the Connections Summary dialog box, click Critical Storm.

The results in the table change to show the worst storm of the 18 that were in this study. In this case, it is a 30-year, 15-minute winter storm, as indicated in the Storm Event column. Also, in the Status column, you can see that more pipes are now reported as being surcharged. This is typical of drainage systems such as this model. More complicated systems that have catchments and water storage features will show a variety of pipe statuses for many different types of storms.

  1. Click Critical Storms again to deactivate it.
  2. Expand the Select Event drop-down and select the 30-year, 15-minute.
    The Plan View in the background, with the Connections Summary report in the foreground. The Capacity Exceeded button is highlighted. At the bottom, the Select Event drop-down has been expanded and the 30-year, 15-minute storm is being selected.
  3. Drag the dialog box aside, and you can see that the highlighted, bold surcharged pipes in the table are also highlighted in the model.
    The InfoDrainage interface, with the Connections Summary dialog box showing dragged up and to the right, so that the model in the Plan View is easier to see. The pipes that are highlighted red in the Connections Summary table are also highlighted red in the model.

To look at the graphical information for an individual pipe:

  1. On the ribbon, Results tab, Item Results panel, expand the Connections drop-down, and select Pipe (4).
    The InfoDrainage interface, with the Junctions button in the ribbon expanded and a pipe being selected from the full list of pipes.
  2. In the Results Pipe (4) dialog box, click the Graphs tab.
    The InfoDrainage interface, with the Results Pipe (4) dialog box open in front of the plan view, and the Graphs tab active. The graph shows two curves that are bell-shaped, a green one that represents the rainfall, and a red one that represents the flow within the selected pipe.

As you can see from the key, the green line represents the rainfall, and the red line represents the flow within Pipe (4). The rainfall graph is representative of a typical dynamic rainfall graph in that it is symmetrical, it starts at zero, builds up to a maximum across a centerline, and then dissipates back down to zero, and in this case, it ends at the 15-minute mark.

The flow graph is very similar in shape. You can see that it lags behind the rainfall in time, and that it builds much more gradually up to the apex, has a nice arc at the top, then comes back down gradually. This smooth increase and decrease in flow provides confidence in the results. If you see rapid oscillations in the flow, it could be a genuine effect, or it could be a sign of an instability. Instabilities occur when the simulation calculations falter and will invalidate the results. So, if you see something that does not make sense, you know it may require further investigation and refinement of the model.

  1. Click the Tables tab.
  2. Review the results.
    The InfoDrainage interface, with the Results Pipe (4) dialog box open and the Tables tab active.
  3. Close the dialog box.
  4. In the ribbon, Results tab, expand the Junctions drop-down and select Manhole (4).
  5. In the Results: Manhole (4) dialog box, review the graphs.
    The Results: Manhole (4) dialog box, displaying three graphs: Flow, Volume, and Depth for the selected manhole.
  6. Close the dialog box.
  7. In the Tree View, right-click Flow1 and select Show Profile.
  8. In the bottom left, click Play to play the simulation through and see the pipes fill up and then drain away.
    The Profile – Flow1 dialog box, with the Play button called out in the corner.
  9. Rewind it to about halfway through and pause it. Notice that the pipes are full, and Manhole (4) is halfway full.
    The Profile – Flow1 dialog box, with the Play button having been clicked by the user. A callout is pointing to a pipe. The water is filling up the pipes and manholes in the profile view.
  10. Zoom into the profile view.

The pipes are full, and Manhole (4) is almost halfway full. So, even though the pipes are surcharged, there is still a great deal of room in the manhole. It is nowhere near flooding, nor is it even within the 300-millimeter threshold that would constitute flood risk. The pink line that is even with the top water level indicates the maximum head of water for the manholes.

  1. Close the profile view.

At this point, these pipes have passed the tests for both the no-surcharge and no-flood states.

  1. Save the model.
Was this information helpful?